Abe, K., Saito, T. , Taguchi , M. Mishima , N. (2016). A Study on Reaction of Residents to Wind Turbines to Promote Local Economy. Procedia CIRP 40, 2016, 463-468.
Achterberg, .P., Houtman, D., Van Bohemen, S. & Manevska, K. (2010). Unknowing but supportive? Predispositions, knowledge, and support for hydrogen technology in the Netherlands. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, 6075-6083.
Achterberg, P. (2014). The changing face of public support for hydrogen technology explaining declining support among the Dutch (2008-2013). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 18711 -18717.
Alsabbagh, M. (2019). Public perception toward residential solar panels in Bahrain. Energy Reports, 5 (2019), 253–261.
Ambrosio-Albalá, P., Upham, P., Bale, C.S.E., 2019. Purely ornamental? Public perceptions of distributed energy storage in the United Kingdom. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 48, 139–150.
Ashworth, P., Sun, Y., Ferguson, M., Witt, K. & She, S. (2019) Comparing how the public perceive CCS across Australia and China. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control86, (2019), 125–133.
Arning, K. Offermann- Van Heek, J., Linzeninch, A. Kaetelhoen, A., Sternberg, A., Bardow, A. & Ziefle, M. (2019). Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany. Energy Policy, 125 (2019), 235–249.
Baxter, J., Morzaria, R., Hirsch, R., 2013. A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and communityconflict. Energy Policy 61, 931-943.
Braun, C. (2017). Not in My Backyard: CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS. Risk Analysis, 37 (12), 2264- 2275.
Bronfman, N. C. Jimenez, R. B., Arevalo, P.C. & Cifuentes, L.A. (2012). Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy Policy, 46 (2012), 246–252.
Brown V. J. (2014). Risk Perception: It’s personal. Environmental Health Perspectives,122(10), A276–A279.
Carr-Cornish, S. & Romanach, L. (2014). Differences in Public Perceptions of Geothermal Energy Technology in Australia. Energies, 2014, 7, 1555-1575.
Chavot, P., Heimlich , C., Masseran , A., Serrano , Y., Zoungrana , J. & Bodin, C. (2018). Social shaping of deep geothermal projects in Alsace: politics, stakeholder attitudes and local democracy. Geotherm Energy 6 (26), 1-21.
Claeson, A-S., Lidén, E., Nordin, M. & Nordin, S. (2013). The role of perceived pollution and health risk perception in annoyance and health symptoms: a population-based study of odorous air pollution. Int Arch Occup Environ Health (2013) 86, 367–374.
Cordoves-Sanches, M. & Vallejos-Romero, A. (2019). Social construction of risk in non-conventional renewable energy: Risk perception as a function of ecosystem services in La Araucanía, Chile. Ecological Economics, 159 (2019), 261–270.
Deignan, B., Harvey, E. & Laurie Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2013). Fright factors about wind turbines and health in Ontario newspapers before and after the Green Energy Act. Health, Risk & Society, 15 (3), 234-250.
Dobers. G. M. (2019). Acceptance of biogas plants taking into account space and place. Energy Policy 135 (2019) 110987.
Dowd, A-M., Itaokab, K., Ashworth, P., Saito, A. & De Best-Waldhober, M. Investigating the link between knowledge and perception of CO2andCCS: An international study. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 28 (2014) 79–87.
Dowd, A-M., Boughen, N., Ashworth, P. & Carr-Cornish, S. (2011). Geothermal technology in Australia: Investigating social acceptance. Energy Policy 39 (2011) 6301–6307.
Fox-Glassman, K. T. & Weber, E. U. (2016). What makes risk acceptable? Revisiting the 1978 psychological dimensions of perceptions of technological risks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 75 (2016) 157–169.
Gaede, J. & Rowlands, I. H. (2018). How ‘transformative’ is energy storage? Insights from stakeholder perceptions in Ontario. How ‘transformative’ is energy storage? Insights from stakeholder perceptions in Ontario. Energy Research & Social Science, 44 (2018), 268–277.
Gaede, J., Jones, C. R., Ganowski, S. & Rowlands, I. H. (2020). Understanding lay-public perceptions of energy storage technologies: Preliminary results of a questionnaire conducted in Canada. Energy Reports 6 (2020), 249–258.
Ganowski, S. Gaede, J. & Rowlands, I. H. (2018). Hot off the press! A comparative media analysis of energy storage framing in Canadian newspapers. Energy Research & Social Science, 46 (2018) 155–168.
O’Garra, T., Mourato, S & Pearson, P. (2008). Investigating attitudes to hydrogen refuelling facilities and the social cost to local residents. Energy Policy 36 (2008), 2074– 2085.
Gennaro Sposato, R. & Hampl, N. (2018). Worldviews as predictors of wind and solar energy support in Austria: Bridging social acceptance and risk perception research. Energy Research & Social Science, 42 (2018), 237–246.
Growth, T. M & Vogth, C. (2014). Residents’ perceptions of wind turbines: An analysis of two townships in Michigan. Energy Policy, 65 (2014), 251–260.
Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., Sandøe, P. (2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41(2), 111-21.
Haraldson, K. Folkesson, A. Saxe, M. & Alvfors, P. (2006). A first report on the attitude towards hydrogen fuel cell buses in Stockholm. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2006), 317–325.
Helsloot, I., Scholtens, A. & Melssen, N. (2014). Risico’s en gevaren in de jeugdzorg: Hoe kijken de bewoners er tegenaan? Crisislab.
Helsloot, I., De Vries, D. & Melssen, N. (2014). Risico’s en gevaren in de Drechtsteden: Hoe kijken de bewoners er tegenaan? Crisislab.
Hesloot, I. & in ’t Veld, R. (2014). Kennisdocument Burgerbetrokkenheid bij Veiligheidsbeleid. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
Hickson, A., Philips, A. & Morales, G. (2007). Public perception related to a hydrogen hybrid internal combustion engine transit bus demonstration and hydrogen fuel. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 2249–2255.
Huijts, N. M. A. (2018). The emotional dimensions of energy projects: Anger, fear, joy and pride about the first hydrogen fuel station in the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science 44 (2018), 138–145.
Huijts N. M. A., Molin E.J.E., van Wee B. (2014). Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: A structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 38 (2014), 153-166.
Huijts, N. M. A., De Vries, G. & Molin, E.J.E (2019). A positive Shift in the Public Acceptability of a Low-Carbon Energy Project After Implementation: The Case of a Hydrogen Fuel Station. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2220.
Karakaya, E. & Sriwannawit, P. (2015). Barriers to the adoption of photovoltaic systems: The state of the art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49 (2015), 60–66.
Karimi, F & Toikka, A. (2018). General public reactions to carbon capture and storage: Does culture matter? International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 70 (2018), 193–201.
Kluge, J., Kowalweski, S. & Ziefle, M. (2015). Inside the User’s Mind – Perception of Risks and Benefits of Unknown Technologies, Exemplified by Geothermal Energy. Conference paper.
Knoblauch, T. A. K., Trutnevyte, E. & Stauffacher, F. (2019). Siting deep geothermal energy: Acceptance of various risk and benefit scenarios in a Swiss-German cross-national study. Energy Policy 128 (2019) 807–816.
Knoblauch, T. A. K., Stauffacher, F, & Trutnevyte, E. (2018). Communicating Low-Probability High-Consequence Risk, Uncertainty and Expert Confidence: Induced Seismicity of Deep Geothermal Energy and Shale Gas. Risk Analysis, 38, (4).
Kontogianni, A., Ch. Tourkolias, Ch., Skourtos, M. & Damigos, D. (2014). Planning globally, protesting locally: Patterns in community perceptions towards the installation of wind farms. Renewable Energy 66 (2014), 170-177.
Kortsch, T., Hildebrnad, J. & Schweizer-Ries, P.(2014). Acceptance of biomass plants e Results of a longitudinal study in the bioenergy-region Altmark. Renewable Energy, 83 (2015), 690-697.
Kunze, C., Hertel, M., 2017. Contested deep geothermal energy in Germany—The emergence of an environmental protest movement. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27, 174–180.
Langer, K., Decker, T., Roosen, J. & Menrad, K. (2016). A qualitative analysis to understand the acceptance of wind energy in Bavaria. Renew. Sustain.Energy Rev. 64, 248-259.
Langer, K., Decker, T., Roosen, J. & Menrad, K. (2018). Factors influencing citizens’ acceptance and non-acceptance of wind energy in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175 (2018), 133-144.
Linzenich, A., Zaunbrecher, B. A. M & Ziefle, (2020). “Risky transitions?” Risk perceptions, public concerns, and energy infrastructure in Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 68 (2020), 101554.
Lofstedt, R. (2015) Effective risk communication and CCS: the road to success in Europe. Journal of Risk Research, 18 (6), 675-691.
Longo. A. Markandya, A. &Petrucci, M. (2008). The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: Willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy. Ecological Econmics, 67, (2 0 0 8 ), 1 4 0 – 1 5 2.
Midden CJH, Huijts NMA. The role of trust in the affective evaluation of novel risks: the case of CO2 storage. Risk Anal 2009 (29), 743–51.
Molin, E. (2005). Causal analysis of hydrogen acceptance. Transportation Research Record.
Montijn‐Dorgelo, F.N.H> & Midden, C.J.H. (2008). The role of negative associations and trust in risk perception of new hydrogen systems. Journal of Risk Research, 11(5), 659-671.
Mueller, C. E. (2020). Examining the inter-relationships between procedural fairness, trust in actors, risk expectations, perceived benefits, and attitudes towards power grid expansion projects. Energy Policy, 141.
Mumford, J. &Gray, D. (2009). Reconciling conflicting interpretations of risk. A case study about the siting of a hazardous plant. J. Commun. Manag. 13, 233–249.
Nichifor, M.A. (2016), “Public reactions towards wind energy instalments. Case study: Romania and the Netherlands”, Management & Marketing. Challenge for the Knowledge Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 532-543.
Ono, K. & Tsunemi, K. (2015). Identification of public acceptance factors with risk perception scales on hydrogen fueling stations in Japan. International Journal of hydrogen energy, (2017), 10697-10707.
L’Orange Seigo, S. Wallquist, L., Dohle, S. Siegrist, M. (2011). Communication of CCS monitoring activities may not have a reassuring effect on the public.
L’Orange Seigo, Dohle, Siegrist (2014). Predictors of risk and benefit perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in regions with different stages of deployment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 38 (2014), 848–863. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (2011), 1674–1679.
Pellizzone, A., Allansdottir, A., De Franco, R., Muttoni, G., Manzella, A., 2015. Exploring public engagement with geothermal energy in southern Italy: a case study. Energy Policy 85, 1–11.
Pellizzone, Agnes Allansdottir, Roberto De Franco, Giovanni Muttonia, Adele Manzella (2017). Geothermal energy and the public: A case study on deliberative citizens engagement in central Italy. Energy Policy 101, (2017), 561–570.
Peters, H.P. 1994. Mass media as an information channel and public arena. Risk Health, Safety and Environment 5, no. 3: 241–50.
Proka, A., Hisschemoller, M. & Loorbach, D. (2020). When top-down meets bottom-up: Is there a collaborative business model for local energy storage? Energy Research & Social Science 69 (2020), 101606.
Rai, V. & Beck, A.L. (2015). Public perceptions and information gaps in solar energy in Texas. Environ. Res. Lett. 10 (2015) 074011.
Rand, J. & Hoen, B (2017). Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned? Energy Research & Social Science 29 (2017), 135–148.
Reith, S., Kölbel, T., Schlagermann, P., Pellizzone, A., Allansdottir, A. (2013). Public acceptance of geothermal electricity production. Geoelec.
Renn, O., Benighaus, C. (2013). Perception of technological risk: Insights from research and lessons for risk communication and management. Journal of Risk Research, 16 (3-4), 293-313.
Ricci, M., Bellaby, P. & Flynn, R. (2008). What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? A critical review and new case study evidence. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33 (2008), 5868-55880.
Roberts, T. & Mander, S. (2011). Assessing public perceptions of CCS: Benefits, challenges and methods. Energy Procedia 4 (2011), 6307–6314.
Schmidt, A. & Donsbach, W. (2016). Acceptance factors of hydrogen and their use by relevant stakeholders and the media. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41 (2016), 4509-4520.
Schmoyer RL, Truett T, Cooper C. (2006). Results of the 2004 knowledge and opinions surveys for the baseline knowledge assessment of the U.S. department of energy hydrogen program. Prepared for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Washington, D.C.
Schulte, I., Hart, D. & van der Vorst, R. (2004). Issues affecting the acceptance of hydrogen fuel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 29 (2004), 677 – 685.
Schumacher, K. & Schultmann, F. (2017). Local Acceptance of Biogas Plants: A Comparative Study in the Trinational Upper Rhine Region. Waste Biomass Valor (2017) 8, 2393–2412.
Sherry-Brennan, F., Devine-Wright, H. & Devine-Wright, P. (2010). Public understanding of hydrogen energy: A theoretical approach. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 5311–5319.
Siegrist, M. & Sutterlin, B. (2014). Human and Nature-Caused Hazards: The Affect Heuristic Causes Biased Decisions. Risk Analysis, 34 (8), 1482-1494.
Siegrist, M. & Arvai, J. (2020). Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research. Risk Analysis, 40 (S1), 2191-2206.
Siegrist, M. (2019). Trust and Risk perception: A review of the literature. Risk Analysis.
Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H. & Earle. T.C. 2006). Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8 (2), 145-156.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311-322.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G. (2007). The Affect Heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177 (3), 1333-1352.
Slovic, P. & Peters, E. (2006). Risk Perception and Affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6)
Soland, M., Steimer, N. & Walter, G. ( 2013). Local acceptance of existing biogas plants in Switzerland. Energy Policy 61 (2013), 802–810.
Sonnberger, M. & Ruddat, M. (2017). Local and socio-political acceptance of wind farms in Germany. Technology in Society 51 (2017) 56-65.
Songsore, E. & Buzelli, M. (2014). Social responses to wind energy development in Ontario: The influence of health risk perceptions and associated concerns. Energy Policy 69 (2014), 285–296.
Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., & van der Werff, E. (2015). Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805
Sutterlin, B. & Siegrist, M. (2016). Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power. Energy Policy 106 (2017), 356–366.
Tcvetkov, P. Cherepovitsyn, A. Fedoseevc, S. (2019). Public perception of carbon capture and storage: A state-of-the-art overview. Heliyon 5 (2019), 02845.
Terwel, Ter Mors & Daamen (2012). It’s not only about safety: Beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht. International journal of greenhouse gas control, 9, 41-51.
Terwel, B.W., Harinck, F., Ellemers, N., Daamen, D.D.L., 2011, ‘Going beyond the properties of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: How trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS’. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5, 181–188.
Terwel, B.W. & Daamen, D. D.L. (2012) Initial public reactions to carbon capture and storage (CCS): differentiating general and local views. Climate Policy, 12 (3),288-300.
Thomas, G., Dempski, C. & Pidgeon, N. (2019). Deliberating the social acceptability of energy storage in the UK. Energy Policy 133 (2019), 110908.
Upham, P. & Roberts, T. (2011). Public perceptions of CCS in context: Results of NearCO2 focus groups in the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Spain and Poland. Energy Procedia 4 (2011), 6338–6344.
Upreti, B. & Van der Horst, D. (2004). National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the
UK:the failed development of a biomass electricity plant. Biomass and Bioenergy 26 (2004), 61 – 69.
Vargas-Payera, S. (2018). Understanding social acceptance of geothermal energy: Case study for Araucanía region, Chile. Geothermics 72 (2018), 138–144.
Visschers, V. H. M. & Siegrist, M. (2018). Differences in Risk Perception Between Hazards and Between Individuals. Psychological Perspectives on Risk and Risk Analysis.
Volken, Wong-Parodi, G. & Trutnevyte, E. (2019). Public awareness and perception of environmental, health and safety risks to electricity generation: an explorative interview study in Switzerland, Journal of Risk Research, 22:4, 432-447.
Walker, C., Baxter, J. & Ouellete, D. (2015). Adding insult to injury: The development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities. Social Science & Medicine, 133 (2015) 358-365.
Wallquist L, Visschers V.H.M. and Siegrist M., Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefi t and risk perception of CCS. Environ Sci Technol 44(17), 6557–6562 (2010).
Wallquist, L., Visschers, V.H.M., Dohle, S. & Siegrist, M. (2011). Adapting communication to the public’s intuitive understanding of CCS. Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol, 1 (2011), 83–91.
Zachariah-Wolff, J.L. & Hemmes, K. (2006). Public Acceptance of Hydrogen in the Netherlands: Two Surveys That Demystify Public Views on a Hydrogen Economy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32 (4), 339-345.
Zimmer, R. & Welke, J. (2012). Let’s go green with hydrogen! The general public’s perspective. International journal of hydrogen energy, 37, 1750-1708.
Handreiking onderzoek naar risicoperceptie in de energietransitie
We verbinden mensen en technologie, kwalitatief en kwantitatief, denken en doen. Adviseurs van KWINK groep.